From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E1767BDF for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:04:53 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1156371402.17977.21.camel@saruman.qstreams.net> References: <1156371402.17977.21.camel@saruman.qstreams.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: CompactFlash on PQII Pro Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:04:44 -0500 To: bwarren@qstreams.com Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Ben Warren wrote: > Hello, > > I have a custom board where we've hung a CompactFlash on the local bus > of an MPC8349 processor, intending to use it in 'True IDE' mode. The > closest thing I've found in the kernel tree is > drivers/ide/ppc/ide-m8xx.c, although it's *very* possible I'm not > looking in the right place. > > I believe my chip's local bus is similar to the 8xx, so making this > driver work with my hardware doesn't seem like that big a deal. I > fully > expect to have to monkey with UPM timings among other things. On the > other hand, this seems like something other people would have done, > maybe with one of the other PQ families like 82xx or 85xx. > > Does anyone have a patch, suggestions or flames they can throw my way? I know I posted a patch for cf-ide.c to lkml some time ago, this was to do a CF in true ide mode using the 83xx localbus. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113877891224982&w=2 We did some UPM setup in u-boot to use two CS on Localbus for this. - kumar