From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8649ADDF48 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:43:44 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <47011BED.8020206@freescale.com> References: <20070928190616.GB20213@loki.buserror.net> <20070929003005.59afc2a0@kernel.crashing.org> <08C0C9CB-C958-4B95-81B8-D0677CBA4399@kernel.crashing.org> <20070929104917.1585737e@kernel.crashing.org> <1B684498-FC47-4F01-A72E-DD27B259613A@kernel.crashing.org> <47011BED.8020206@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpm: Describe multi-user ram in its own device node. Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:43:38 -0500 To: Scott Wood Cc: Timur Tabi , PowerPC dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2007, at 1:49 AM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: >>> cpms have dpram, qe has muram. these two are the same stuff in >>> fact. Or you are asking about have QE stuff utilize such a >>> binding at the same pass? >> I was asking about both these things. > > As stated in the commit message, QE can use this; it just needs a > compatible entry in the data node. can some one look at that. - k