From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC881DEB3D for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:25:45 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala To: benh@kernel.crashing.org In-Reply-To: <1209048813.9060.192.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: [RFC][WIP][PATCH] Add IRQSTACKS to ppc32 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:25:38 -0500 References: <1209021537.9060.156.camel@pasglop> <43F83C6F-D84B-4626-8974-9BCEDF03194E@kernel.crashing.org> <1209048813.9060.192.camel@pasglop> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 07:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> I'm going to change it to be just lmb_alloc() so it will be difficult >> to share with ppc64 (other than w/an ifdef). > > Unless we change lmb_alloc to just be an lmb_alloc_base with 0 and > have > the later do the right thing ? don't follow. Look at the "real" patch and comment on that. > You don't put highmem in the LMBs ? If you do, we do need to have the > max lowmem there no ? we restrict lmb alloc via LMB_REAL_LIMIT in include/asm-powerpc/lmb.h - k