From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: 31 Aug 2000 17:41:14 -0500 Subject: Re: asm in OF? YES! From: "Bruce Anderson" To: "Gabriel Paubert" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 2:52 AM, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > >You've just got to love OF portability across machines and architecture >independance :-( Add to this the fact that I have somewhere a FirmWorks >document which claims that on PPC the top of the stack is always in r28, >r20/r21 are scratch registers. r31 is still the stack pointer (and r30 the >return stack AFAIR). > > Your asumption about OF portability is in error. Apple does not use FirmWorks OF code. Apple created their own "OF" version that resembles FirmWorks OF vocabulary. " Stamp out root logins . . . . su " --Bruce Anderson This message was created and sent using Cyberdog 2.0, MacOS 8.6, awk, find, sed, sendmail, sh, and NetBSD a free Multi-Platform OS. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/