From: Prashant Bhole <prashantsmailcenter@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Tirumala Marri <tmarri@apm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel cannot see PCI device
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:18:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimtYqH1Nsx5gKmHRQecFWVmFbKeBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105251157.12537.sr@denx.de>
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2011 23:43:08 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:25 +0530, Prashant Bhole wrote:
>> > Fixed the problem by soft resetting the PCIe port in the function
>> > ppc460ex_pciex_port_init_hw().
>> > Is it a right thing to do?
>
> <snip>
>
>> Well, it's odd that you'd have to do that, maybe something the
>> bootloader is doing ?
>>
>> I personally don't mind but I'd like Stefan and/or Tirumala opinion on
>> this.
>
> Not sure. I had no problems with the PCIe cards I tested with the current
> code. But from my experience, this card reset behavior is highly card/device
> dependent.
>
> It would be good to know that this new code doesn't break detection of other
> PCIe cards/devices. Prashant, did you check this new code with other PCIe
> cards/devices as well? If this patch doesn't break other PCIe cards like the
> Intel PRO/1000, then:
>
I agree, this behavior is device specific. I have other boards with
different disk
controller chips. Those chips were detected without soft resetting the port.
New code has been checked with three PCIe devices:
Marvell 88SE9485, SiI 3132 and LSISAS2008.
-Prashant
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTimm98Xxx8y9qM8DUSR4rTDPSFpgHw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=tvyOPoN3f3v_C+NuVOwr+YKaRJA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-18 14:14 ` Kernel cannot see PCI device Bjorn Helgaas
2011-05-19 12:41 ` Prashant Bhole
2011-05-19 17:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-05-19 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 23:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-05-24 4:55 ` Prashant Bhole
2011-05-24 21:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-25 9:57 ` Stefan Roese
2011-05-25 10:48 ` Prashant Bhole [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimtYqH1Nsx5gKmHRQecFWVmFbKeBw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=prashantsmailcenter@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
--cc=tmarri@apm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).