From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc1-s27.bay0.hotmail.com (unknown [65.54.246.99]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA16E67B65 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:30:56 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <44B6DC18.9020409@dlasys.net> From: "Ming Liu" To: dhlii@comcast.net Subject: RE: Xilinx hard TEMAC Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:30:53 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi David, >The hardware I have to support is the Hard TEMAC on the LocalLink Bus. >It is my understanding that this is the TEMAC builtin to the FX parts, >not one that is created in the FPGA. That's right. The hard Temac is a built-in hard core in virtex 4 FPGA. >Is anyone else working to support that configuration ? I think that is >basically the same as the GRSD TEMAC. >Is it sane to try to adapt the soft TEMAC patch from the list ? I am working on that. But I am not so experienced and still working. :) >I actually started trying to get the posted TEMAC patch working but that >quickly went off the rails - I presumed because the hard and soft >TEMAC's are just too different, or because the xilinx_edk really does >not support the hard TEMAC. I don't think so. I think the hard and soft cores are similar. I have included the enet drive in Linux 2.4 and it works well. Now I am including the Temac in 2.6 and have not see the result. >Regardless. I need to get a driver working, and I am not looking to >duplicate effort. I am doing that. So we can share our experience. Regards Ming _________________________________________________________________ Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/