LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri <mamsadegh@hotmail.com>
To: "Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)" <mike.koss@ngc.com>,
	David Baird <dhbaird@gmail.com>, <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:35:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY115-W415137ADEA0BE4A33D2BAEB23F0@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EDAE140DF1B2FC42B5867C22CA0B333F0A5952@XMBIL132.northgrum.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2727 bytes --]


Hi

Well, As you know, we now need a PLB version, XPS_LL_TEMAC is connected to PLB not MPMC2...yes I remember those days of Xilinx GSRD and MPMC2 however it seems that the current architecture has slight changes. 

about the git repository of Xilinx, Although I do not believe on it, I'll give it a try...thanks for info.

well, what about Grant Likely... and his git tree?

Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:44:14 -0600
From: mike.koss@ngc.com
To: mamsadegh@hotmail.com; dhbaird@gmail.com; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org










In case anyone is interested, I'm currently working on 
an almost-kernel-ready version that will be self-contained based on the LL-DMA 
version (the native MPMC port, not the PLB). It's based upon the old adapter 
from MontaVista, that I originally ported to 2.6 and the MPMC2. Unfortunately, 
it won't be ready for another few weeks since I'm working on hardware images 
currently.
 
-- Mike



From: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri 
[mailto:mamsadegh@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 3:54 
AM
To: David Baird; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: 
RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC


thanks for you reply david,

As far as I know the Linux driver 
for Xilinx PLB TEMAC was two parts : 1- adapter.c and 2- the rest of the driver 
files

Only adapter.c was really a linux related file and the rest of the 
files were Xilinx generic driver code for PLB TEMAC.

correct?

then 
now, I know EDK 9.2 generates the needed Linux support package and needed 
related files, so if this is the case can we use these files as the needed 
driver in our linux kernel?

by the way, i did never hear about this git 
repository before...can you describe us, where is it and how we can access it 
and which projects are now hosted by it?


thanks


> Date: 
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:54:30 -0700
> From: dhbaird@gmail.com
> To: 
mamsadegh@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs 
PLB_TEMAC
> 
> On Jan 21, 2008 12:36 AM, Mohammad Sadegh Sadri 
<mamsadegh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > As you know Xilinx PLB TEMAC 
is a module which connects Hard TEMAC in
> > Virtex-4 FX devices to PLB 
bus,
> > now, in the new release of EDK , EDK 9.2 Xilinx has added a 
new interface
> > core , which is called XPS_LL_TEMAC and has a 
different structure than
> > normal PLB TEMAC. spacially it has some 
additional data transfer buses.
> >
> > Now the question 
is,... is there any linux driver available for this new
> > 
core?
> 
> Yes there is, but I had to use the git sources 
at:
> 
> git.xilinx.com





_________________________________________________________________


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4020 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-23  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-21  7:36 Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
2008-01-21  7:55 ` David Baird
     [not found] ` <440abda90801202354l5a0ce4caq382af5991e36f775@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-21  8:54   ` Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
2008-01-21 17:44     ` Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
2008-01-23  7:35       ` Mohammad Sadegh Sadri [this message]
2008-01-23 13:43         ` Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
2008-01-23 15:12           ` Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
2008-01-23 19:35             ` Stephen Neuendorffer
2008-01-24  1:01               ` USB device for ppc440epx Leonid
2008-01-24  1:20                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-01-24  1:34                   ` Leonid
2008-01-21 18:42     ` Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC Stephen Neuendorffer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BAY115-W415137ADEA0BE4A33D2BAEB23F0@phx.gbl \
    --to=mamsadegh@hotmail.com \
    --cc=dhbaird@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mike.koss@ngc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox