From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA5967A65 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 05:54:27 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1106120622.10851.42.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> References: <1106120622.10851.42.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:45:19 -0600 To: "David Woodhouse" Cc: Linux Kernel list , linuxppc-dev list , Linus Torvalds , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] raid6: altivec support List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David, We did talk about looking at using some work Ben did in ppc64 with OF=20 in ppc32. John Masters was looking into this, but I havent heard much=20= from him on it lately. The firmware interface on the ppc32 embedded side is some what broken=20 in my mind. - kumar On Jan 19, 2005, at 1:43 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 15:11 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > We should probably "backport" that simplification to ppc32... > > Yeah.... I'm increasingly tempted to merge ppc32/ppc64 into one arch > like mips/parisc/s390. Or would that get vetoed on the basis that we > don't have all that horrid non-OF platform support in ppc64 yet, and > we're still kidding ourselves that all those embedded vendors will > either not notice ppc64 or will use OF? > > --=20 > dwmw2 > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe=20 > linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at=A0 http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at=A0 http://www.tux.org/lkml/