From: zDL Linux PPC <linuxppc@4bridgeworks.com>
To: 'Gerhard Jaeger' <g.jaeger@sysgo.com>,
zML Linux PPC Dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Cc: zML Linux PPC Embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: RE: Power PC 440GX Jumbo Packets EMAC2/3
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:12:21 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C18BA5DDB58DD511BD0700C0DF0DD450294286@NTSERVER4> (raw)
> On Thursday 24 February 2005 12:46, zDL Linux PPC wrote:
> > I have been doing some experiments with Jumbo packets (MTU
> 9000) and have
> > noticed that once you exceed the 2KB fifo size, I end up
> with no response
> > from the box.
> >
> > I can ping the box with no problem at all at sizes greater
> than 2KB, however
> > upon further investigation I noticed packets of size 2006
> bytes causes no
> > further packet to be transmitted (adding debug prints to
> ibm_emac_core.c,
> > the driver believes the packet has been transmitted), after
> adding a further
> > 42 bytes of header information this comes to the exact size
> of the Transmit
> > Fifo 2048 (2KB). I have also changed the Transmit Fifo
> Register to 1024
> > bytes, this solves the problem at 2006 bytes however now it
> has moved to 982
> > bytes of data (+42bytes of header = 1024)
> >
> > Has anyone else experienced this problem while either using
> a smaller
> > transmit fifo (512 or 1024 bytes) and MTU 1500 or a larger
> MTU (>2033) and
> > EMAC transmit fifo of 2048. I guess this will really apply
> to people with
> > larger MTU not many will decrease the Tx fifo, and I am
> further guessing
> > that not many are using 9000 MTU as not much hardware seems
> to support it, I
> > can only use it through a direct connection between PC's
> and not through a
> > switch!
> >
> > Any suggestions on how to overcome this problem??? My only
> idea is to either
> > add data to the packet (don't think this will work) or
> forceably fragment
> > the packet (if it is 2K in size) to ensure that it never
> uses the exact size
> > of the tx fifo.....
>
> Have you applied Matt Porters patch? It has been submitted at
> the beginning
> of this month?
No I haven't seen it on either of these lists, do you know where I can find
it
Thanks
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-24 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 13:12 zDL Linux PPC [this message]
2005-02-24 13:45 ` Power PC 440GX Jumbo Packets EMAC2/3 Gerhard Jaeger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-24 13:55 zDL Linux PPC
2005-02-24 11:46 zDL Linux PPC
2005-02-24 12:19 ` Gerhard Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C18BA5DDB58DD511BD0700C0DF0DD450294286@NTSERVER4 \
--to=linuxppc@4bridgeworks.com \
--cc=g.jaeger@sysgo.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox