linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christopher M. Riedl" <cmr@codefail.de>
To: "Gabriel Paubert" <paubert@iram.es>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] powerpc/signal: Add unsafe_copy_{vsx, fpr}_from_user()
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:55:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C8YHSKQ99VC4.M9Y0WOFVUTBQ@geist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201165440.GA8929@lt-gp.iram.es>

On Mon Feb 1, 2021 at 10:54 AM CST, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:55:44AM -0600, Christopher M. Riedl wrote:
> > On Thu Jan 28, 2021 at 4:38 AM CST, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Christopher M. Riedl
> > > > Sent: 28 January 2021 04:04
> > > > 
> > > > Reuse the "safe" implementation from signal.c except for calling
> > > > unsafe_copy_from_user() to copy into a local buffer.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christopher M. Riedl <cmr@codefail.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.h
> > > > index 2559a681536e..c18402d625f1 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.h
> > > > @@ -53,6 +53,33 @@ unsigned long copy_ckfpr_from_user(struct task_struct *task, void __user *from);
> > > >  				&buf[i], label);\
> > > >  } while (0)
> > > > 
> > > > +#define unsafe_copy_fpr_from_user(task, from, label)	do {		\
> > > > +	struct task_struct *__t = task;					\
> > > > +	u64 __user *__f = (u64 __user *)from;				\
> > > > +	u64 buf[ELF_NFPREG];						\
> > >
> > > How big is that buffer?
> > > Isn't is likely to be reasonably large compared to a reasonable
> > > kernel stack frame.
> > > Especially since this isn't even a leaf function.
> > >
> > 
> > I think Christophe answered this - I don't really have an opinion either
> > way. What would be a 'reasonable' kernel stack frame for reference?
>
> See include/linux/poll.h, where the limit is of the order of 800 bytes
> and the number of entries in an on stack array is chosen at compile time
> (different between 32 and 64 bit for example).
>
> The values are used in do_sys_poll, which, with almost 1000 bytes of
> stack footprint, appears close to the top of "make checkstack". In
> addition do_sys_poll has to call the ->poll function of every file
> descriptor in its table, so it is not a tail function.
>
> This 264 bytes array looks reasonable, but please use 'make checkstack'
> to verify that the function's total stack usage stays within reason.

Neat, looks like total usage is a bit larger but still reasonable and
less than half of 800B:

0xc000000000017e900 __unsafe_restore_sigcontext.constprop.0 [vmlinux]:352

Thanks for the tip!

>
> Gabriel
>
> > 
> > > > +	int i;								\
> > > > +									\
> > > > +	unsafe_copy_from_user(buf, __f, ELF_NFPREG * sizeof(double),	\
> > >
> > > That really ought to be sizeof(buf).
> > >
> > 
> > Agreed, I will fix this. Thanks!
> > 
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > > > +				label);					\
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < ELF_NFPREG - 1; i++)				\
> > > > +		__t->thread.TS_FPR(i) = buf[i];				\
> > > > +	__t->thread.fp_state.fpscr = buf[i];				\
> > > > +} while (0)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define unsafe_copy_vsx_from_user(task, from, label)	do {		\
> > > > +	struct task_struct *__t = task;					\
> > > > +	u64 __user *__f = (u64 __user *)from;				\
> > > > +	u64 buf[ELF_NVSRHALFREG];					\
> > > > +	int i;								\
> > > > +									\
> > > > +	unsafe_copy_from_user(buf, __f,					\
> > > > +				ELF_NVSRHALFREG * sizeof(double),	\
> > > > +				label);					\
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < ELF_NVSRHALFREG ; i++)				\
> > > > +		__t->thread.fp_state.fpr[i][TS_VSRLOWOFFSET] = buf[i];	\
> > > > +} while (0)
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> > > >  #define unsafe_copy_ckfpr_to_user(to, task, label)	do {		\
> > > >  	struct task_struct *__t = task;					\
> > > > @@ -80,6 +107,10 @@ unsigned long copy_ckfpr_from_user(struct task_struct *task, void __user *from);
> > > >  	unsafe_copy_to_user(to, (task)->thread.fp_state.fpr,	\
> > > >  			    ELF_NFPREG * sizeof(double), label)
> > > > 
> > > > +#define unsafe_copy_fpr_from_user(task, from, label)			\
> > > > +	unsafe_copy_from_user((task)->thread.fp_state.fpr, from,	\
> > > > +			    ELF_NFPREG * sizeof(double), label)
> > > > +
> > > >  static inline unsigned long
> > > >  copy_fpr_to_user(void __user *to, struct task_struct *task)
> > > >  {
> > > > @@ -115,6 +146,8 @@ copy_ckfpr_from_user(struct task_struct *task, void __user *from)
> > > >  #else
> > > >  #define unsafe_copy_fpr_to_user(to, task, label) do { } while (0)
> > > > 
> > > > +#define unsafe_copy_fpr_from_user(task, from, label) do { } while (0)
> > > > +
> > > >  static inline unsigned long
> > > >  copy_fpr_to_user(void __user *to, struct task_struct *task)
> > > >  {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.26.1
> > >
> > > -
> > > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes,
> > > MK1 1PT, UK
> > > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
> > 
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28  4:04 [PATCH v4 00/10] Improve signal performance on PPC64 with KUAP Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] powerpc/uaccess: Add unsafe_copy_from_user Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] powerpc/signal: Add unsafe_copy_{vsx, fpr}_from_user() Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28 10:38   ` David Laight
2021-01-28 12:05     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-01 15:55     ` Christopher M. Riedl
2021-02-01 16:15       ` David Laight
2021-02-01 16:55         ` Christopher M. Riedl
2021-02-01 17:37           ` David Laight
2021-02-01 17:43             ` Christopher M. Riedl
2021-02-01 16:54       ` Gabriel Paubert
2021-02-01 20:55         ` Christopher M. Riedl [this message]
2021-02-04  6:09           ` Michael Ellerman
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] powerpc/signal64: Move non-inline functions out of setup_sigcontext() Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] powerpc: Reference param in MSR_TM_ACTIVE() macro Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] powerpc/signal64: Remove TM ifdefery in middle of if/else block Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] powerpc/signal64: Replace setup_sigcontext() w/ unsafe_setup_sigcontext() Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] powerpc/signal64: Replace restore_sigcontext() w/ unsafe_restore_sigcontext() Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] powerpc/signal64: Rewrite handle_rt_signal64() to minimise uaccess switches Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] powerpc/signal64: Rewrite rt_sigreturn() " Christopher M. Riedl
2021-01-28  4:04 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] powerpc/signal64: Use __get_user() to copy sigset_t Christopher M. Riedl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C8YHSKQ99VC4.M9Y0WOFVUTBQ@geist \
    --to=cmr@codefail.de \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paubert@iram.es \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).