From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x242.google.com (mail-it0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3x5ck45gC2zDq6W for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:47:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-it0-x242.google.com with SMTP id v193so12020885itc.2 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:47:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170615185418.13980-1-javier@dowhile0.org> References: <20170615185418.13980-1-javier@dowhile0.org> From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:47:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 00/16] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Linux Kernel , Rob Herring , Javier Martinez Canillas , Florian Larysch , David Lechner , Rob Herring , Andy Shevchenko , Catalin Marinas , =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren_Brinkmann?= , Simon Horman , Michal Simek , Dinh Nguyen , Russell King , Will Deacon , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Sekhar Nori , Scott Wood , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Joachim Eastwood , Mark Rutland , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Masahiro Yamada , Michael Ellerman , Santosh Shilimkar , Linux-Renesas , Paul Mackerras , Magnus Damm , linuxppc-dev , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , Linux I2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello Wolfram, On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > This series is a follow-up to patch [0] that added an OF device ID table > to the at24 EEPROM driver. As you suggested [1], this version instead of > adding entries for every used tuple, only adds a single > entry for each chip type using the "atmel" vendor as a generic fallback. > > The first patch documents in the DT binding what's the correct vendor to > use and what are the ones that are being deprecated. The second one adds > the OF device ID table for the at24 driver and the next patches use this > vendor in the compatible string to each DTS that defines a compatible I2C > EEPROM device node. > > Patches can be applied independently since the DTS changes without driver > changes are no-op and the OF table won't be used without the DTS changes. > > [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/14/589 > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/15/99 > Are you planning to pick this series? It has been in the list for months and were resent many times... Best regards, Javier