From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-tul01m020-f179.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA00B6EEA for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:00:07 +1100 (EST) Received: by obbup6 with SMTP id up6so867744obb.38 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:00:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca In-Reply-To: <1329962108.20389.19.camel@pasglop> References: <1329954613.20389.15.camel@pasglop> <20120223013947.GC3212@ponder.secretlab.ca> <1329962108.20389.19.camel@pasglop> From: Grant Likely Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:59:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: powerpc/mpic: Fix allocation of reverse-map for multi-ISU mpics To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:39 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> Looks fine to me. =A0This will conflict with the irqdomain tree in linux= -next, >> but it will be a trivial fixup. =A0Still, if you prefer I can pick this >> up into my tree. > > Well, I'm also going to carry a slightly modified variant of Kyle's > mpic series so we'll have to deal with conflicts regardless, I'll > keep that one. > > What I might do tho is pull your tree in powerpc-next at some point, > when you tell me it's frozen solid, this will potentially make my life > easier. It's frozen solid now. Any changes from this point on will be new patches on top. g.