From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF46DDE22 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:41:15 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200711252322.09370.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [POWERPC] Add docs for Freescale 83xx SATA device tree nodes Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:41:07 -0600 References: <200711252322.09370.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Nov 25, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: >> + * Freescale 8xxx/3.0 Gb/s SATA nodes >> + >> + SATA nodes are defined to describe on-chip Serial ATA >> controllers. >> + Each SATA port should have its own node. >> + >> + Required properties: >> + - compatible : compatible list, contains 2 entries, >> first is >> + "fsl,sata-CHIP", where CHIP is the processor >> + (mpc8315, mpc8379, etc.) and the second is >> + "fsl,sata-pq2pro" >> + - interrupts : >> + - interrupt-parent : optional, if needed for interrupt mapping >> + - reg : >> + > > Should this maybe also mandate a compatible property that is defined > in a way to match the generic (p)ata_of_platform driver? Is there something about the (p)ata_of_platform driver you think we can use. The SATA controller here is a unique piece of HW and requires a unique driver so I'm not sure what we get from (p)ata_of_platform. - k