From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DF2C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77450610CE for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:13:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 77450610CE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H7n226qfQz2yfg for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:13:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=a8etmcMm; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::131; helo=mail-lf1-x131.google.com; envelope-from=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=a8etmcMm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H7n1F6vF7z2yHg for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:12:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id y28so1027783lfb.0 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:12:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iTZ+eFGbCDolHBudnZBl3uwTbCyuUnDDlNjR7YoJlN8=; b=a8etmcMmxUvXlsF8SSWc/UbOYHx7MrB6jf8XzEcL+zzyCDw6Kat7Q5QwvXdHdsuFVl tZyCY2YvkPFPJTWsENvKQB8encBX0h2+ti3zl4D14UnnVtEr1ME5aaiD3w/D1plemf+X MJaYSKqDIGmy52Iro7ivbir9UMYjn+0QhvsAg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iTZ+eFGbCDolHBudnZBl3uwTbCyuUnDDlNjR7YoJlN8=; b=qdHQWowAm4sg2yiOCzQmB9sAzOHIeox8fnc/wv89AP6ZMAOzKxd1rRXUc+3q1xeNrV YN2Anbyh5dLXsU0BbgOETyle2aG6z0XQtw8YNFC8DFHnBzq8SICOYuHj7E67Sar4r5CS 9bpW0WpV+agZR6rL0C7A/dJ7evW5WBWGvTrVV3ta+Ovzp+Yp+oroz04I+LSoqssHOvfW Hw7qA/G9J8khMNJYEMMGS4n56QyzH+K1QPxsnMiPmtNM0P/ukdm6HVza4kuplb4Yvfh9 1QhEJid8DzBQHINCpHYbRe1GE7I98t/LjOeXvSc9R0qlJLTuNB4fNA1UTR/Am7fWUJxM FZyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fSxDCvnVCoo81i22YDwYoYqujdrUJ3V/+BpTHh+iw7HKlfnlZ tL9WKKAq73gs0Qy2P3QpVqh2G1I7VXQOCFeRrkM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3IMtTBjol8m7PnwOGnP1yher6buumvqcJ2FQDfzyedRJMuIkrK5nk3NZpz/KzHJJKeDq/Zg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3192:: with SMTP id i18mr10934396lfe.209.1631585549360; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com. [209.85.167.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm1151628ljp.12.2021.09.13.19.12.28 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id a4so25264099lfg.8 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:12:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3984:: with SMTP id j4mr1498523lfu.280.1631585548512; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:12:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210914100853.3f502bc9@canb.auug.org.au> <20210914105359.5c651d55@canb.auug.org.au> <20210914120818.4a102b46@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20210914120818.4a102b46@canb.auug.org.au> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:12:12 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree To: Stephen Rothwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , PowerPC , Linux Kernel Mailing List Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:08 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > That patch works for me - for the ppc64_defconfig build at least. Yeah, I just tested the allmodconfig case too, although I suspect it's essentially the same wrt the boot *.S files, so it probably doesn't matter. I'd like to have Michael or somebody who can actually run some tests on the end result ack that patch (or - even better - come up with something cleaner) before committing it. Because yeah, the build failure is annoying and I apologize, but I'd rather have the build fail overnight than commit something that builds but then is subtle buggy for some reason. But if I don't get any other comments by the time I'm up again tomorrow, I'll just commit it as "fixes the build". Linus