From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5ABC433FF for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5BF214C6 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:30:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8C5BF214C6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464v1V236WzDrKq for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 04:30:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.222.194; helo=mail-qk1-f194.google.com; envelope-from=arndbergmann@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Received: from mail-qk1-f194.google.com (mail-qk1-f194.google.com [209.85.222.194]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464tzV0zzKzDr7C for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 04:28:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id s145so72396877qke.7 for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:28:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=meYZAOaqZ5KaoPmXpKdQX8BQbEOPXVSFqQOk/Zs8rsA=; b=lq0BRhHrq2sq/C6h8qg4/SUURmv0rWHydx6v/8Pb40KMokLJXsYtot2gYqhTN0y+rr kOCM1x7CabTKgNQ3uYKSYkk6YEoqabWYstiWU6coMx/p/5wxRZzG9jAOPEnP64aQ8wM+ E4OGOdmxoR1Dc66to5m/qvzWzc3S+tLIXv0kmrYGX+tBeVWI8UZXgLpDUFwq+sm0sTza 2yA/sfPbT4mzbGKImmzD9aRQp8VFy7xHp9VOhSn7ZI8y1bktlBxyLX1lIpurnbc3TCUj ZnbwQk4CvFaw/d6dcQKnqRzVuFPXPdXVrMcfh9NJeTxArmPvQVpNk/eyBT1q1pXl82kU F8yg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX9pKOMFC/ahbP413LcEPYXjBLI2vLsMNFFbniyWprZaR0GgL0X ZIgyU3d6gPBIgD4NDbU0Annv9PpUn7jZvBnx8ns= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzLxdQHC0gUKiwVO2NJAHpHdYXdIWcXVTsS7VCUpP4IfTQCbdx5V1hKHFH1R7BU89gajb/sE4UT39NYqjWxAtw= X-Received: by 2002:a37:4ac3:: with SMTP id x186mr18866428qka.138.1565375314918; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:28:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87h873zs88.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20190809182106.62130-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20190809182106.62130-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 20:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix inline asm constraints for dcbz To: Nick Desaulniers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kbuild test robot , Linux Kernel Mailing List , clang-built-linux , Paul Mackerras , Nathan Chancellor , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:21 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote: > static inline void dcbz(void *addr) > { > - __asm__ __volatile__ ("dcbz %y0" : : "Z"(*(u8 *)addr) : "memory"); > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("dcbz %y0" : "=Z"(*(u8 *)addr) :: "memory"); > } > > static inline void dcbi(void *addr) > { > - __asm__ __volatile__ ("dcbi %y0" : : "Z"(*(u8 *)addr) : "memory"); > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("dcbi %y0" : "=Z"(*(u8 *)addr) :: "memory"); > } I think the result of the discussion was that an output argument only kind-of makes sense for dcbz, but for the others it's really an input, and clang is wrong in the way it handles the "Z" constraint by making a copy, which it doesn't do for "m". I'm not sure whether it's correct to use "m" instead of "Z" here, which would be a better workaround if that works. More importantly though, clang really needs to be fixed to handle "Z" correctly. Arnd