* error: redefinition of ‘dax_supported’
@ 2020-09-21 18:34 Nick Desaulniers
2020-09-21 18:47 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-09-21 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams, Vishal Verma, dave.jiang
Cc: kernelci.org bot, linux-nvdimm, LKML, clang-built-linux,
linuxppc-dev
Hello DAX maintainers,
I noticed our PPC64LE builds failing last night:
https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047043
https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047056
https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047099
and looking on lore, I see a fresh report from KernelCI against arm:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/?q=dax_supported
Can you all please take a look? More concerning is that I see this
failure on mainline. It may be interesting to consider how this was
not spotted on -next.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: error: redefinition of ‘dax_supported’
2020-09-21 18:34 error: redefinition of ‘dax_supported’ Nick Desaulniers
@ 2020-09-21 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2020-09-21 19:50 ` Nick Desaulniers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2020-09-21 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Desaulniers
Cc: Dave Jiang, kernelci.org bot, linux-nvdimm, LKML,
clang-built-linux, Vishal Verma, linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:35 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hello DAX maintainers,
> I noticed our PPC64LE builds failing last night:
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047043
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047056
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047099
> and looking on lore, I see a fresh report from KernelCI against arm:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/?q=dax_supported
>
> Can you all please take a look? More concerning is that I see this
> failure on mainline. It may be interesting to consider how this was
> not spotted on -next.
The failure is fixed with commit 88b67edd7247 ("dax: Fix compilation
for CONFIG_DAX && !CONFIG_FS_DAX"). I rushed the fixes that led to
this regression with insufficient exposure because it was crashing all
users. I thought the 2 kbuild-robot reports I squashed covered all the
config combinations, but there was a straggling report after I sent my
-rc6 pull request.
The baseline process escape for all of this was allowing a unit test
triggerable insta-crash upstream in the first instance necessitating
an urgent fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: error: redefinition of ‘dax_supported’
2020-09-21 18:47 ` Dan Williams
@ 2020-09-21 19:50 ` Nick Desaulniers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-09-21 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams
Cc: Dave Jiang, kernelci.org bot, linux-nvdimm, LKML,
clang-built-linux, Vishal Verma, linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:47 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:35 AM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello DAX maintainers,
> > I noticed our PPC64LE builds failing last night:
> > https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047043
> > https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047056
> > https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047099
> > and looking on lore, I see a fresh report from KernelCI against arm:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/?q=dax_supported
> >
> > Can you all please take a look? More concerning is that I see this
> > failure on mainline. It may be interesting to consider how this was
> > not spotted on -next.
>
> The failure is fixed with commit 88b67edd7247 ("dax: Fix compilation
> for CONFIG_DAX && !CONFIG_FS_DAX"). I rushed the fixes that led to
> this regression with insufficient exposure because it was crashing all
> users. I thought the 2 kbuild-robot reports I squashed covered all the
> config combinations, but there was a straggling report after I sent my
> -rc6 pull request.
>
> The baseline process escape for all of this was allowing a unit test
> triggerable insta-crash upstream in the first instance necessitating
> an urgent fix.
No worries; just checking that failures are root-caused. I see it on
top of v5.9-rc6:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/.
I don't see it on -next today, but assume it will be there tomorrow.
Thanks for the info.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-21 19:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-21 18:34 error: redefinition of ‘dax_supported’ Nick Desaulniers
2020-09-21 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2020-09-21 19:50 ` Nick Desaulniers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).