From: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Different behaviour when using "nosmp" parameter on SMP and UP
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:04:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL8zT=gGfBYsLcsKobJPhfhEhNeLcrYMoWh2kv0odT0n0wnZgQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D70E8CC4-9FA3-4DC9-B623-02F32EFBFE0F@kernel.crashing.org>
2011/12/1 Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>:
>
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a P2020 CPU (powerpc) and I compiled it with two different defcon=
figs.
>> The first one is a SMP, 2 cores, launched with the "nosmp" kernel
>> parameter, the other one is an UP kernel.
>>
>> My driver behaviour is not the same whether launching one or the
>> other. It is hard to explain more precisely, as it deals only with
>> ioctl which only does ioread32/iowrite32 on a PCIe device.
>> But I can tell that it never works the same way when UP (not working
>> correctly), or SMP "nosmp" (working) or even SMP (not working).
>>
>> AFAIK, the "nosmp" parameter should tell the kernel to act the same is
>> if it is an UP kernel, and it disables IO APIC, which is not an issue
>> in my case.
>>
>> Can you think about anything that would explain it, or would help me
>> debugging it ?
>
> This is a bit odd, hard to say w/o more details on what exactly your code=
is trying to do and wait the failure is.
I understand that it is difficult to give more details, but the driver
is not mine, and I can't give all the code associated.
> The larger differences between SMP & UP build would be setting of memory =
attribute for cache coherency. =C2=A0In UP case we don't set it.
>
> Between SMP 'nosmp' and SMP 'on' cases you seem like you're hitting some =
locking condition.
>
> Guessing your running into a timing & locking issue that you're getting l=
ucky on the SMP 'nosmp' case such that it just happens to work.
Any idea on how to debug this ? I am using a 2.6.35 kernel.
Thanks,
JM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 9:57 Different behaviour when using "nosmp" parameter on SMP and UP Jean-Michel Hautbois
2011-12-01 14:03 ` Kumar Gala
2011-12-01 15:04 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois [this message]
2011-12-01 15:56 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-12-01 16:14 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2011-12-01 17:52 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2011-12-01 19:35 ` Kumar Gala
2011-12-01 20:09 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL8zT=gGfBYsLcsKobJPhfhEhNeLcrYMoWh2kv0odT0n0wnZgQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jhautbois@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).