From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E933E2C00B1 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:32:02 +1000 (EST) Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id gf11so3132047vcb.39 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:31:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1371514253.9073.8@snotra> References: <1371241083.2996.7@snotra> <2435509.QyTW5GJC53@pcimr> <1371514253.9073.8@snotra> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:31:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/pci: Fix setup of Freescale PCI / PCIe controllers From: Michael Guntsche To: Scott Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rojhalat Ibrahim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 06/17/2013 08:15:33 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote: >> >> On Friday 14 June 2013 15:18:03 Scott Wood wrote: >> > On 83xx: >> > cc1: warnings being treated as errors >> > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c:100:23: >> > error: 'fsl_indirect_pcie_ops' defined but not used >> > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.o] Error 1 >> > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> > >> > I can fix this when applying, but this makes me wonder how you tested >> > it, given that the whole point is to fix 83xx... Did you fix this and >> > then accidentally sent a stale version? >> > >> > Also, please be careful that the patch doesn't get line wrapped -- I >> > had to manually unwrap a couple places. Use git send-email if you >> > can't get KMail to cooperate. >> > >> > -Scott >> >> Sorry about the mess. I'll send a v3. >> Please note: I don't have an 83xx system. So I can only test if it >> compiles, >> which I obviously did not do with the right config. > > > OK, so it looks like it was Michael who ran into the problem on 83xx. > Michael, could you test the v3 patch that Rojhalat posted? > > -Scott I did a quick check against -rc6 and the system compiles and boots up fine. /Mike