From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de,
Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>, Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>,
Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>,
Easwar Hariharan <easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Guo Weikang <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
"Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] powerpc/smp: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_MC to guard MC scheduling bits
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 14:37:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUD8RZqPL5ZYyJrwJB+XL_Tkn-rsLx7WvUmn6y5M_tAtw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014094210.GQ3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hoi Peter,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 at 11:42, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 14:57, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > Now, when I look at unifying those config options (there's a metric ton
> > > of crap that's duplicated in the arch/*/Kconfig), I end up with something
> > > like the below.
> > >
> > > And while that isn't exact, it is the closest I could make it without
> > > making a giant mess of things.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> >
> > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 7bd291abe2da09f5 ("sched:
> > Unify the SCHED_{SMT,CLUSTER,MC} Kconfig") in v6.18-rc1.
> >
> > > --- a/arch/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> > > @@ -41,6 +41,44 @@ config HOTPLUG_SMT
> > > config SMT_NUM_THREADS_DYNAMIC
> > > bool
> > >
> > > +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT
> > > + bool
> > > +
> > > +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER
> > > + bool
> > > +
> > > +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC
> > > + bool
> > > +
> > > +config SCHED_SMT
> > > + bool "SMT (Hyperthreading) scheduler support"
> > > + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT
> > > + default y
> >
> > This is now enabled by default everywhere, while it was disabled by
> > default on most architectures before...
>
> I'm not sure ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT counts as everywhere, but yes.
> A fair deal of the architectures had all this default yes, and I had to
> pick something. Can't make an omelette without breaking an egg and all
> that :/
OK.
> > > + help
> > > + Improves the CPU scheduler's decision making when dealing with
> > > + MultiThreading at a cost of slightly increased overhead in some
> > > + places. If unsure say N here.
> >
> > So it should default to n?
>
> That's just help text that got carried around. Many of the architectures
> that had default y still had this text on. I suppose we can change it if
> someone cares.
Please do so.
> > If it is really needed on some architectures or platforms, I guess
> > they can still select it explicitly?
>
> There were 4 cases:
>
> - arch doesn't support SMT
> - arch supports SMT and lets user pick, default Y
> - arch supports SMT and lets user pick, default N
> - arch mandates SMT
>
> Of those 3 are still possible, the one we lost is the default N case.
>
> Old configs that have =N will continue to have N. New configs might end
> up with Y.
>
> Why is this a problem?
While old .config files will see no changes, old defconfig files do
need updates.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 4:13 [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask() K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] " K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-28 23:06 ` Tim Chen
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] powerpc/smp: Rename cpu_corgroup_* to cpu_corgrp_* K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-01 3:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] powerpc/smp: Export cpu_coregroup_mask() K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:54 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] powerpc/smp: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_MC to guard MC scheduling bits K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:49 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-28 14:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-01 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-01 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-14 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 12:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2025-10-14 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 15:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-08-26 9:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-01 4:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_smt_mask() across core and all arch K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 8:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_cls_mask() across core and x86 K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_mc_mask() across core and all arch K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_pkg_mask() " K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask() Shrikanth Hegde
2025-08-26 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-29 7:53 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-08-29 8:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-01 4:39 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-01 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-01 17:06 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdUD8RZqPL5ZYyJrwJB+XL_Tkn-rsLx7WvUmn6y5M_tAtw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).