From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x244.google.com (mail-oi0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848B91A025F for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:23:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: by oiab3 with SMTP id b3so120353oia.2 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 01:23:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <20150712102527.356151908@telegraphics.com.au> <20150712102528.107134628@telegraphics.com.au> <87d1zwc4dj.fsf@igel.home> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:23:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v4 03/25] m68k/atari: Move Atari-specific code out of drivers/char/nvram.c From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Finn Thain Cc: Andreas Schwab , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Linux/m68k" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Finn Thain writes: >> > BTW, I didn't change the SCSI ID location in NVRAM. This code says 16 >> > whereas atari_scsi says 14. Which one is correct? >> >> I think atari_scsi is wrong. The best source I could find >> (http://www.gratifiant.com/nvram-falcon-t561185) places it after the >> video mode byte, thus at byte 16. > > Thanks for that. BTW, I googled a phrase from that page and found this one > http://toshyp.atari.org/en/004009.html > which may be closer to the source. Hence "int" is 16-bits in all those references? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds