* Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3
[not found] <1425898222-19721-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
@ 2015-03-09 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2015-03-09 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; +Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> JFYI, when comparing v4.0-rc3[1] to v4.0-rc2[3], the summaries are:
> - build errors: +18/-7
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
'SMC91X_NOWAIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:47
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
'SMC91X_USE_32BIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:11
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
'SMC91X_USE_DMA' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:30
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: unknown
field 'flags' specified in initializer: => 85:2
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: variable
'smc91x_platdata' has initializer but incomplete type: => 84:15
pxa255-idp_defconfig
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c: error: expected
'}' before ';' token: => 198:43
lpd270_defconfig
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c: error:
'smc91c_platdata' undeclared (first use in this function): => 271:12
neponset_defconfig
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pleb.c: error:
'smc91c_platdata' undeclared here (not in a function): => 57:22
pleb_defconfig
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: error:
implicit declaration of function 'machine_has_neponset'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 2363:2
neponset_defconfig
smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by
"ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet?
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:
error: 'SECTION_SIZE_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function):
=> 27:31
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error:
'PAGES_PER_SECTION' undeclared (first use in this function): =>
1836:46, 1178:18
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error:
'PAGE_SECTION_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function): =>
1177:20
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit
declaration of function '__nr_to_section'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1841:3
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit
declaration of function 'find_memory_block_hinted'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1848:3
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit
declaration of function 'pfn_to_section_nr'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1837:3
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit
declaration of function 'present_section_nr'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1838:3
powerpc-randconfig
> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/8557/ (255 out of 257 configs)
> [3] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/8529/ (256 out of 257 configs)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3
2015-03-09 10:56 ` Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3 Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-09 14:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-03-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Monday 09 March 2015 11:56:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > JFYI, when comparing v4.0-rc3[1] to v4.0-rc2[3], the summaries are:
> > - build errors: +18/-7
>
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
> 'SMC91X_NOWAIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:47
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
> 'SMC91X_USE_32BIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:11
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
> 'SMC91X_USE_DMA' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:30
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: unknown
> field 'flags' specified in initializer: => 85:2
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: variable
> 'smc91x_platdata' has initializer but incomplete type: => 84:15
>
> pxa255-idp_defconfig
>
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c: error: expected
> '}' before ';' token: => 198:43
>
> lpd270_defconfig
>
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c: error:
> 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared (first use in this function): => 271:12
>
> neponset_defconfig
>
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pleb.c: error:
> 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared here (not in a function): => 57:22
>
> pleb_defconfig
>
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: error:
> implicit declaration of function 'machine_has_neponset'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 2363:2
>
> neponset_defconfig
>
> smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by
> "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet?
It's not?
This should be part of that patch:
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = {
};
struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = {
- .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT;
+ .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT,
};
static struct platform_device smc91x_device = {
and I thought I had tested all defconfigs as well as hundreds of randconfigs
(the right ones) successfully this time.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3
2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2015-03-09 14:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2015-03-09 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by
>> "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet?
>
> It's not?
>
> This should be part of that patch:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = {
> };
>
> struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = {
> - .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT;
> + .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT,
Ah OK. Sorry, I thought there was a different reason.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-09 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1425898222-19721-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
2015-03-09 10:56 ` Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3 Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-09 14:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).