From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@jurai.org>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>,
Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [v2] m68k: mac: use time64_t in RTC handling
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 12:49:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWzO1jzd=8SN5G_eoFObEAJR4-5u7JDExMefR__30QauA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2chXVhz+UJ+ujg8QMqyMmJ4zGj9XKuFZ+MsJ=dGqb3eg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Arnd, Finn,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:55 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 7:26 AM, Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> The real-time clock on m68k (and powerpc) mac systems uses an unsigned
> >> 32-bit value starting in 1904, which overflows in 2040, about two years
> >> later than everyone else, but this gets wrapped around in the Linux code
> >> in 2038 already because of the deprecated usage of time_t and/or long in
> >> the conversion.
> >>
> >> Getting rid of the deprecated interfaces makes it work until 2040 as
> >> documented, and it could be easily extended by reinterpreting the
> >> resulting time64_t as a positive number. For the moment, I'm adding a
> >> WARN_ON() that triggers if we encounter a time before 1970 or after 2040
> >> (the two are indistinguishable).
> >>
> >
> > I really don't like the WARN_ON(), but I'd prefer to address that in a
> > separate patch rather than impede the progress of this patch (or of this
> > series, since 3/3 seems to be unrelated).
> >
> > BTW, have you considered using the same wrap-around test (i.e. YY < 70)
> > that we use for the year register in the other RTC chips?
>
> That wrap-around test would have the same effect as the my original
> version (aside from the two bugs I now fixed), doing rougly
>
> - return time - RTC_OFFSET;
> + return (u32)(time - RTC_OFFSET);
>
> or some other variation of that will give us an RTC that supports all dates
> between 1970 and 2106. I don't think anyone so far had a strong
> preference here, so I went with what Mathieu suggested and kept the
> original Mac behavior, but added the WARN_ON().
So, is this safe to apply?
Especially in light of the warnings seen by Meelis with the PPC version.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-08 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 14:02 [PATCH 1/3] [v2] powerpc: mac: fix rtc read/write functions Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-19 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] [v2] m68k: mac: use time64_t in RTC handling Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-22 5:26 ` Finn Thain
2018-06-22 8:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-08 10:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2018-07-08 11:45 ` Finn Thain
2018-07-18 11:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-07-18 12:02 ` Finn Thain
2018-07-18 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-18 13:49 ` Finn Thain
2018-07-18 14:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-22 11:56 ` Finn Thain
2018-07-23 8:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-06-19 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] [v2] m68k: remove unused set_clock_mmss() helpers Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-18 11:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-06-20 7:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] [v2] powerpc: mac: fix rtc read/write functions Mathieu Malaterre
2018-07-01 15:47 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-09 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-10 1:18 ` Finn Thain
2018-06-27 4:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-06-27 10:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-27 12:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-06-27 21:41 ` [1/3,v2] " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdWzO1jzd=8SN5G_eoFObEAJR4-5u7JDExMefR__30QauA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=funaho@jurai.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=malat@debian.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).