Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by
>> "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet?
>
> It's not?
>
> This should be part of that patch:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = {
>  };
>
>  struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = {
> -       .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT;
> +       .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT,

Ah OK. Sorry, I thought there was a different reason.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds