From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EDEC433E1 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA032078B for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="oiYao3LS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8AA032078B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BW5Ml22YPzDqZH for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:34:11 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::344; helo=mail-ot1-x344.google.com; envelope-from=allen.lkml@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=oiYao3LS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ot1-x344.google.com (mail-ot1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::344]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BW5KR6RCtzDqb9 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:32:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ot1-x344.google.com with SMTP id t7so15779929otp.0 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:32:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CukyYxKQagzxSnoAUerbnhafgFTcDCc+vCHDuzHrDm0=; b=oiYao3LSY05RtHiCa7E8GRzIrl9VRRJYDZjBtQ/ubmceLYQblalUYWs7OwMluhpnUV 1OD/4u8SmwCBI4jQy+CFzB9DiOBMSi80AOG36VcptLnhf6mlFt3cEPpf08XASzer3N1U 8ju50bDwgsm8cIKentn09KT7dEn43UVXAcfqk+qtmEK0ijNDJx9xsmN1YdHBtsSuJmgX XysM+f14J1mp0IjxEpAjmlNUmnhz1n1EVGQKFm+eyUG+fLys9+zxOsW+/DEZwSjDm1AD eZY+FJmAR1IxLWdli8IGiG0WHu1UOvpZRaDlGQ0XHmg+jBupgMHOuue6LE6XSsPUVN5S P/Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CukyYxKQagzxSnoAUerbnhafgFTcDCc+vCHDuzHrDm0=; b=GhlM70vnQH0JAP7PRCVDXcp+X8gmsPIO1LBdZlMPrnH/1Ma9LDostnoIx80VBCfKIn LNpWEOk9S0tQ6V83+4oSnCOAn7cMp+IfWrLYL04kE0SRqKjCZK9bFpc4NxAl6I6smQ6Z GGh8u6iZoanZnomA/ufgHP4RU0BceY/wAIBc6pTt5JuQhmwcZ2rqkZk8Ko2RGfRRPa+q gNuCla9SG3H9ELRyJ9YT3if3Ih4rkBxVFCkiJMfC7tGQedqi8uBYM9iurdG64wO570fm A5UO6qEpDF76+bPbJj7yaEc9vM4++oSNj9KjM5/q9lE/R7nwSxLFP9GogKavyfT463TI GQqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334ZeeXSmkikczZMzJT67Npt4hR1I6TyH+HRPdyv7+2ZPqTL151 oc4iLIlurt5VSxcg3rPgW0QhamO/XUd3S90jkG4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWr9qkdSOHISPy+oYHPAYjGVOTOnZt44b3JJOq1hBBUFKJuivSXPClh61XAr/SYq05DdwSLWmaagZHOPuDyto= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:128c:: with SMTP id g12mr13892805otg.242.1597743128285; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200817085703.25732-1-allen.cryptic@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Allen Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:01:56 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] sound: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() To: Takashi Iwai Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Kees Cook , timur@kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clemens@ladisch.de, tiwai@suse.com, o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, Allen Pais , perex@perex.cz, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" > > Well, then at the next time, please mention it explicitly in the cover > letter. Usually this kind of API conversion isn't done during rc. Or > it's done systematically via script or such. So unless mentioned, > it's not expected to be carried to 5.9. Sorry for having missed the detail. Will take care of it in the future. > > In anyway, if the final purpose is to drop the old tasklet API and > that's the plan for 5.9, all tree-wide changes have to be done in > 5.9 beforehand. Was that the decision? The idea was to land the tree-wide changes as part of 5.9 > > > > I have a patch set to drop the whole tasklet usage in sound/* > > > (destined for 5.10, to be submitted soon), so if that's for 5.10, > > > it'll be likely superfluous. > > > > I have picked patches from your tree to adapt to this new API. > > Those can be picked in 5.10 I suppose. > > Adapting the changes are trivial, don't worry. It was just a question > of how to organize changes. Sure, Thank you. - Allen