From: Oliver <oohall@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
aik@ozlabs.ru, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: eeh_event: convert semaphore to completion
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:18:31 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOSf1CHqxaGdz_F0EifqHmD+0ZgKVno7aRZEXUG1880C5YvHGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210215203.1936171-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 8:52 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> For this use case, completions and semaphores are equivalent,
> but semaphores are an awkward interface that should generally
> be avoided, so use the completion instead.
IIRC Sam has been reworking the locking used inside of EEH so this is
probably going to clash with his changes. Converting to a completion
is probably a good idea, but we might want to do it as a part of his
series since it's going to collide with this anyway.
Sam, what do you think?
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c
> index 61c9356bf9c9..227e57f980df 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> */
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(eeh_eventlist_lock);
> -static struct semaphore eeh_eventlist_sem;
> +static DECLARE_COMPLETION(eeh_eventlist_event);
> static LIST_HEAD(eeh_eventlist);
>
> /**
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int eeh_event_handler(void * dummy)
> struct eeh_pe *pe;
>
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> - if (down_interruptible(&eeh_eventlist_sem))
> + if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&eeh_eventlist_event))
> break;
>
> /* Fetch EEH event from the queue */
> @@ -102,9 +102,6 @@ int eeh_event_init(void)
> struct task_struct *t;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - /* Initialize semaphore */
> - sema_init(&eeh_eventlist_sem, 0);
> -
> t = kthread_run(eeh_event_handler, NULL, "eehd");
> if (IS_ERR(t)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(t);
> @@ -142,7 +139,7 @@ int eeh_send_failure_event(struct eeh_pe *pe)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&eeh_eventlist_lock, flags);
>
> /* For EEH deamon to knick in */
> - up(&eeh_eventlist_sem);
> + complete(&eeh_eventlist_event);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.20.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-10 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-10 21:51 [PATCH] powerpc: eeh_event: convert semaphore to completion Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-10 23:18 ` Oliver [this message]
2018-12-10 23:33 ` Sam Bobroff
2018-12-22 9:54 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOSf1CHqxaGdz_F0EifqHmD+0ZgKVno7aRZEXUG1880C5YvHGQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).