From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D74DDF20 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:17:06 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20070716065144.GH1678@pengutronix.de> References: <200707141831.04107.jbe@pengutronix.de> <1184446133.6059.284.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070716065144.GH1678@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: How to add platform specific data to a of_device Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:16:59 +0200 To: Robert Schwebel Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Is there a reason why there is sooo much interaction of the > platform code with the oftree? Yes. Since the decision has been made to require a device tree for every platform, arch/powerpc is in the luxury position that we can actually exploit the benefits of _having_ a tree for every platform. Segher