From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EACDDED3 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:00:00 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <17961.22721.462194.785356@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <17961.22721.462194.785356@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Change 440GP platform to ppc440 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:58:57 -0500 To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Apr 20, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Kumar Gala writes: > >> I don't see any reason the 440GP should its own platform. Posting >> this to >> see if anyone thinks otherwise. > > I recall dimly that there was some user-visible difference between the > 440GP and the other 440 processors, and that's why we made the > platform string different. I don't recall what the difference was. The 440GP seems to be a book-e userspace w/o FP. Not sure how it differs from other 440's. It seems like the 440EP are the only ones with FPUs. - k