From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48D0687D5 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:09:06 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20051123053711.1110.qmail@web50607.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20051123053711.1110.qmail@web50607.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:09:47 -0600 To: le tang Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Linux on MPC8541 and MPC8560 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Nov 22, 2005, at 11:37 PM, le tang wrote: > Hi, > > I got questions on developing the linux on MPC8560 and > MPC8541. > > 1) Which version of linux would be best suited for > these two processors? 2.6.14 is a good starting point. Older 2.6 kernels have support for MPC8540/MPC8560, I forget when we introduced it. > 2) Can I make model these two processor accurately > with device trees on the PSIM? Extremely unlikely. While I think PSIM has some support for e500 I dont think it handles anything close enough to boot linux. > 3) I have cross compiled gcc with target as > powerpc-eabi option, and I am using > powerpc-eabi-objdump to disassemble a pre-compiled > code, I have tried use -M e500 options, but not sure > if that would give a very accurate assemly listing. It should be. The kernel is build with -me500 being passed to the assembler. for the majority of code it doesn't matter. it will mainly get proper decode of m{t,f}spr instructions and a few other things. - kumar