Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Paul Mackerras]

Aegis Lin (1):
      [POWERPC] spufs: Use separate timer for /proc/spu_loadavg calculation

Andre Detsch (1):
      [POWERPC] spufs: DMA Restart after SIGSEGV

Arnd Bergmann (1):
      [POWERPC] spufs: block fault handlers in spu_acquire_runnable

Benjamin Herrenschmidt (2):
      [POWERPC] Fix for via-pmu based backlight control
      [POWERPC] Fix possible NULL deref in ppc32 PCI

Christoph Hellwig (2):
      [POWERPC] spufs: add enchanced simple attr macros
      [POWERPC] spufs: make state_mutex interruptible

Emil Medve (1):
      [POWERPC] Optimize counting distinct entries in the relocation sections

Jeremy Kerr (5):
      [POWERPC] spufs: move fault, lscsa_alloc and switch code to spufs module
      [POWERPC] spufs: fix incorrect interrupt status clearing in backing mbox stat poll
      [POWERPC] spufs: use #defines for SPU class [012] exception status
      [POWERPC] spufs: rework class 0 and 1 interrupt handling
      [POWERPC] spufs: Don't leak kernel stack through an empty {i,m}box_info read

Julio M. Merino Vidal (1):
      [POWERPC] spufs: fix typos in sched.c comments

Luke Browning (4):
      [POWERPC] spufs: add backing ops for privcntl register
      [POWERPC] spufs: reorganize spu_run_init
      [POWERPC] spufs: spu_find_victim may choose wrong victim
      [POWERPC] spufs: decouple spu scheduler from spufs_spu_run (asynchronous scheduling)

Masato Noguchi (2):
      [POWERPC] cell: wrap master run control bit
      [POWERPC] spufs: don't set reserved bits in spu interrupt status

Scott Wood (1):
      [POWERPC] Implement arch disable/enable irq hooks.

Stephen Rothwell (5):
      [POWERPC] Add EHEA and EHCA as modules in the ppc64_defconfig
      [POWERPC] The builtin matches for ibmebus.c can be __initdata
      [POWERPC] Constify the of_device_id passed to of_platform_bus_probe
      [POWERPC] Pointers marked as __iomem do not need to be volatile
      [POWERPC] Make non-PCI build work again

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Arnd Bergmann]

Thanks for adding the patches I submitted for 2.6.25.

What's your position on this one:

  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=15600
  OProfile: remove dependency on spufs module

Jeremy agreed that we should merge it in 2.6.24, but if you think
it's too late for that, please add it to your 2.6.25 queue.

	Arnd <><

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Marian Balakowicz]

Any changes to add new 52xx targets:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14661
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14662
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14663
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14743
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14665
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14666
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14667
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14668
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14669
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14670
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14671
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14672
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14673

Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until
2.6.25 window opens.

Thanks,
Marian

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Kumar Gala]

On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Marian Balakowicz wrote:

>
> Any changes to add new 52xx targets:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14661
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14662
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14663
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14743
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14665
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14666
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14667
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14668
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14669
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14670
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14671
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14672
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14673
>
> Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until
> 2.6.25 window opens.

A few of these patches may need to get updated do to other changes.   
For example the i2c nodes in .dts.

- k

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Grant Likely]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1236 bytes --]

On 12/21/07, Marian Balakowicz <m8@semihalf.com> wrote:
>
>
> Any changes to add new 52xx targets:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14661
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14662
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14663
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14743
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14665
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14666
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14667
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14668
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14669
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14670
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14671
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14672
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14673
>
> Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until
> 2.6.25 window opens.


I'll be picking these up next week.  I haven't had time to do it earlier.

Cheers,
g.



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2744 bytes --]

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Marian Balakowicz]

Grant Likely wrote:
> 
> On 12/21/07, *Marian Balakowicz* <m8@semihalf.com
> 
>     Any changes to add new 52xx targets:
> 
>     http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14661
[...]
> 
>     Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until
>     2.6.25 window opens.
> 
> 
> I'll be picking these up next week.  I haven't had time to do it earlier.

Great, I'll retest the set with the latest vanilla next week.

Thanks,
Marian

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Grant Likely]

On 12/21/07, Marian Balakowicz <m8@semihalf.com> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > On 12/21/07, *Marian Balakowicz* <m8@semihalf.com
> >
> >     Any changes to add new 52xx targets:
> >
> >     http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14661
> [...]
> >
> >     Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until
> >     2.6.25 window opens.
> >
> >
> > I'll be picking these up next week.  I haven't had time to do it earlier.
>
> Great, I'll retest the set with the latest vanilla next week.

Actually, you should retest against Paulus' latest tree instead
because that is what it will be merged against.

Cheers,
g.




-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Marian Balakowicz]

Grant Likely wrote:
> On 12/21/07, Marian Balakowicz <m8@semihalf.com> wrote:
>> Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On 12/21/07, *Marian Balakowicz* <m8@semihalf.com
>>>
>>>     Any changes to add new 52xx targets:
>>>
>>>     http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988&id=14661
>> [...]
>>>     Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until
>>>     2.6.25 window opens.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll be picking these up next week.  I haven't had time to do it earlier.
>> Great, I'll retest the set with the latest vanilla next week.
> 
> Actually, you should retest against Paulus' latest tree instead
> because that is what it will be merged against.

OK, got it.

Cheers,
Marian

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[David Woodhouse]

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=15192 ?

-- 
dwmw2

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Paul Mackerras]

David Woodhouse writes:

> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=15192 ?

Not my bailiwick.  Send it to the RTC subsystem maintainer or Andrew
Morton.  You can put Acked-by me on it if you like.

Paul.

Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches

[Michael Neuling]

Paulus,

Can you take the crash shutdown hook patches as well for 2.6.25?

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=414&id=15546
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=414&id=15547

Mikey


In message <18283.44454.618519.155696@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> you wrote:
> Aegis Lin (1):
>       [POWERPC] spufs: Use separate timer for /proc/spu_loadavg calculation
> 
> Andre Detsch (1):
>       [POWERPC] spufs: DMA Restart after SIGSEGV
> 
> Arnd Bergmann (1):
>       [POWERPC] spufs: block fault handlers in spu_acquire_runnable
> 
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt (2):
>       [POWERPC] Fix for via-pmu based backlight control
>       [POWERPC] Fix possible NULL deref in ppc32 PCI
> 
> Christoph Hellwig (2):
>       [POWERPC] spufs: add enchanced simple attr macros
>       [POWERPC] spufs: make state_mutex interruptible
> 
> Emil Medve (1):
>       [POWERPC] Optimize counting distinct entries in the relocation sections
> 
> Jeremy Kerr (5):
>       [POWERPC] spufs: move fault, lscsa_alloc and switch code to spufs modul
e
>       [POWERPC] spufs: fix incorrect interrupt status clearing in backing mbo
x stat poll
>       [POWERPC] spufs: use #defines for SPU class [012] exception status
>       [POWERPC] spufs: rework class 0 and 1 interrupt handling
>       [POWERPC] spufs: Don't leak kernel stack through an empty {i,m}box_info
 read
> 
> Julio M. Merino Vidal (1):
>       [POWERPC] spufs: fix typos in sched.c comments
> 
> Luke Browning (4):
>       [POWERPC] spufs: add backing ops for privcntl register
>       [POWERPC] spufs: reorganize spu_run_init
>       [POWERPC] spufs: spu_find_victim may choose wrong victim
>       [POWERPC] spufs: decouple spu scheduler from spufs_spu_run (asynchronou
s scheduling)
> 
> Masato Noguchi (2):
>       [POWERPC] cell: wrap master run control bit
>       [POWERPC] spufs: don't set reserved bits in spu interrupt status
> 
> Scott Wood (1):
>       [POWERPC] Implement arch disable/enable irq hooks.
> 
> Stephen Rothwell (5):
>       [POWERPC] Add EHEA and EHCA as modules in the ppc64_defconfig
>       [POWERPC] The builtin matches for ibmebus.c can be __initdata
>       [POWERPC] Constify the of_device_id passed to of_platform_bus_probe
>       [POWERPC] Pointers marked as __iomem do not need to be volatile
>       [POWERPC] Make non-PCI build work again
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>