From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 12/29] powerpc/sprs: Avoid taking async interrupts caused by register fuzzing
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:51:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CXURPUMH8EKD.3GZ7EISK22JLA@wheely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c06b1cec-8a39-41ff-91e6-ad7bb99b3341@redhat.com>
On Tue Dec 19, 2023 at 9:47 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/12/2023 14.42, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Storing certain values in some registers can cause asynchronous
> > interrupts that can crash the test case, for example decrementer
> > or PMU interrupts.
> >
> > Change the msleep to mdelay which does not enable MSR[EE] and so
> > avoids the problem. This allows removing some of the SPR special
> > casing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > powerpc/sprs.c | 14 ++------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/powerpc/sprs.c b/powerpc/sprs.c
> > index 01041912..313698e0 100644
> > --- a/powerpc/sprs.c
> > +++ b/powerpc/sprs.c
> > @@ -481,12 +481,7 @@ static void set_sprs(uint64_t val)
> > continue;
> > if (sprs[i].type & SPR_HARNESS)
> > continue;
> > - if (!strcmp(sprs[i].name, "MMCR0")) {
> > - /* XXX: could use a comment or better abstraction! */
> > - __mtspr(i, (val & 0xfffffffffbab3fffULL) | 0xfa0b2070);
> > - } else {
> > - __mtspr(i, val);
> > - }
> > + __mtspr(i, val);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -536,12 +531,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > if (pause) {
> > migrate_once();
> > } else {
> > - msleep(2000);
> > -
> > - /* Taking a dec updates SRR0, SRR1, SPRG1, so don't fail. */
> > - sprs[26].type |= SPR_ASYNC;
> > - sprs[27].type |= SPR_ASYNC;
> > - sprs[273].type |= SPR_ASYNC;
> > + mdelay(2000);
> > }
>
> IIRC I used the H_CEDE stuff here on purpose to increase the possibility
> that the guest gets rescheduled onto another CPU core on the host, and thus
> that it uncovers sprs that are not saved and restored on the host more
> easily. So I'd rather keep the msleep() here.
Ah. Not a bad idea. I'll see about making it deal with H_CEDE
instead.
I wonder if there would be a way to stress host CPU migration
in the test harness. Instead of waiting for QEMU to exit, the
script could run taskset in a loop to bounce it around.
Conceptually easy, probably fiddly to wire things up nicely.
I may try to take a look at adding that... but after this
series so it doesn't get any bigger :/
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-22 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-16 13:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/29] powerpc: updates, P10, PNV support Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 01/29] arch-run: Clean up temporary files properly Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/29] arch-run: Clean up initrd cleanup Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 03/29] migration: use a more robust way to wait for background job Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 04/29] migration: Support multiple migrations Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 05/29] arch-run: rename migration variables Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 06/29] powerpc: Quiet QEMU TCG pseries capability warnings Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 5:55 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 07/29] powerpc: Add a migration stress tester Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 5:58 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 10:32 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 08/29] powerpc: Require KVM for the TM test Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 5:59 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 09/29] powerpc: Fix interrupt stack alignment Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 6:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 10/29] powerpc/sprs: Specify SPRs with data rather than code Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 6:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 10:32 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 11/29] powerpc/sprs: Don't fail changed SPRs that are used by the test harness Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:34 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 12/29] powerpc/sprs: Avoid taking async interrupts caused by register fuzzing Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:47 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 9:51 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 13/29] powerpc: Make interrupt handler error more readable Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 9:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 14/29] powerpc: Expand exception handler vector granularity Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:55 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 15/29] powerpc: Add support for more interrupts including HV interrupts Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 16/29] powerpc: Set .got section alignment to 256 bytes Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:01 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 17/29] powerpc: Discover runtime load address dynamically Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 18/29] powerpc: Fix stack backtrace termination Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 9:55 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 19/29] scripts: allow machine option to be specified in unittests.cfg Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:27 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 20/29] scripts: Accommodate powerpc powernv machine differences Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:36 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 21/29] powerpc: Support powernv machine with QEMU TCG Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 22/29] powerpc: Fix emulator illegal instruction test for powernv Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:39 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 23/29] powerpc/sprs: Test hypervisor registers on powernv machine Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 24/29] powerpc: interrupt tests Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 13:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 9:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 25/29] powerpc: Add rtas stop-self support Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 14:15 ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 26/29] powerpc: add SMP and IPI support Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 27/29] powerpc: Avoid using larx/stcx. in spinlocks when only one CPU is running Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 28/29] powerpc: Add atomics tests Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 29/29] powerpc: Add timebase tests Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 14:23 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CXURPUMH8EKD.3GZ7EISK22JLA@wheely \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox