From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
To: Yuji Nishimura <yujin@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
Stefan Nickl <Stefan.Nickl@kontron.com>
Subject: Re: Stability of network/io on MPC8540ADS?
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:52:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D0320B10-A5D7-11D8-AB97-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40A515E2.30401@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
Y.Nishimura ,
It looks like the patch was not included in your email. I would
appreciate seeing it and evaluating if it is something we should
include in the stock kernel.
- kumar
On May 14, 2004, at 1:54 PM, Yuji Nishimura wrote:
>
> Helo Stefan,
>
> I evaluated MPC8540ADS and found out similar problem few weeks ago. I
> made tiny patch and it works well.
> I also evaluated with NEC ehci pci device. The result was fine.
> I wrote 1GB data to external usb-2.0 HDD via USB-2.0(ehci), that works
> well.
> I also try to use ftp(MPC8540=server) and transfer (R/W) 2047MB data
> via
> TSEC(gianfar) and it also works well.
> If you try to use this patch, please let me know. I think patch
> requires
> more evaluation...
>
> Best Regards,
> Y.Nishimura - Tokyo, Japan.
>
>
>
> Stefan Nickl wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> since the linuxppc-2.4 port to our custom 8540 board
>> has made some progress now, I went back to the ADS
>> board for some cross-checking.
>>
>> I've experienced several reproducible lockups that
>> are triggered by heavy IO and/or networking.
>>
>> Kernel is vanilla linuxppc-2.4.27-pre2, gcc 3.2.3,
>> root=/dev/nfs (Gentoo -Os -mcpu=603e)
>>
>> 1) Using netcat to write data over tcp:
>> cat /dev/zero | nc lucy 3000
>>
>> "lucy" is running "nc -l -p 3000 |pipeworks > /dev/null"
>> This freezes the ADS after a few seconds.
>>
>> 2) Writing to the nfsroot server:
>> cat /dev/urandom > /test
>>
>> The same. Reading seems ok.
>>
>> 3) Writing to a USB2.0 HDD connected via PCI
>> interface board (OHCI compatible).
>>
>> Lockup after ~70MB of writing
>>
>> I haven't tested explicitly, but the kernel that
>> was shipped with the board (some 2.4.20?) didn't
>> seem to have such problems.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Stefan Nickl
>> Kontron Modular Computers
>>
>>
>>
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-14 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-13 15:27 Stability of network/io on MPC8540ADS? Stefan Nickl
2004-05-13 22:55 ` Kumar Gala
2004-05-14 18:54 ` Yuji Nishimura
2004-05-14 18:52 ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2004-05-14 19:11 ` Yuji Nishimura
2004-05-17 6:48 ` Stefan Nickl
2004-05-17 21:42 ` Kumar Gala
2004-05-17 22:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-05-17 23:24 ` Dan Malek
2004-05-18 13:39 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D0320B10-A5D7-11D8-AB97-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com \
--to=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=Stefan.Nickl@kontron.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=yujin@pp.iij4u.or.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).