From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.52.174]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D4DF67B42 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:08:18 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1147657558.21291.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <87wtcplejw.fsf@blackdown.de> <17510.55656.607530.491585@zot.electricrain.com> <1147657558.21291.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Dan Malek Subject: Re: Load average 1.0 on idle machine Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 02:08:13 -0400 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Brian D. Carlstrom" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On May 14, 2006, at 9:45 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > .... For now, consider > the load avergage value bogus :) It's not bogus :-) If you happen to schedule periodic tasks that are sampled with load average computes, or sleep them "uninterrupible", they are counted in the load average. -- Dan