From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E05CD11C2 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 04:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=ddaHtn2d; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VDqbs02X2z3dVJ for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:29:29 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=ddaHtn2d; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::634; helo=mail-pl1-x634.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VDqb14y85z2yt0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:28:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e4f341330fso1853455ad.0 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 21:28:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712723320; x=1713328120; darn=lists.ozlabs.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=2u+70epJjW00+Aasor34vmJ+f/znX0w0jA47UJBKtDg=; b=ddaHtn2dVo7MfOljVnwyBnwxgDs/Y73yEm7aTSPMC1Sn04o59yQv54dtb7cHE91Nol 9FwDiV3m9ElXnlOPlnQug8oR0WpRmVMY69i+IiOJpxnpsjN41ycca3kjPKc+ZLLX+wdK XK32sCmOHhxhVqAoQBQxW5ScqdyzNECDjWBG1p1H3tZOZ8UeXmXlv0uGQLFX26+JXiSu YIH64n4BiVk2RSIDmHgZBVQ7rTcfoKrztT1KKKeA/w/VJW2vD3ZA5H1bSyQrRZ5iLjrP HLiHfqxIXnXUEkCsKkxhVnqWGlMZ1tiP/QkAF5/75e7+X/Dn19fB4z7xYEiExAiyYN6v wzfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712723320; x=1713328120; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2u+70epJjW00+Aasor34vmJ+f/znX0w0jA47UJBKtDg=; b=Sc8xQG0DY0YpaaHgXpR5GDoJjVQloArODwbrHO7xof0zT5lWG9HG+gdRVXS1CjtX7y YKcGXaKyFi1NY+zt1wt+KVbdGXMK2UZtUXaooJlVXpuqBHu7XB9ysJaP4EBi8LDb7Lcu 8IHlgdudswsvE72fmSvR1gcUria9lgwhpjbNTbg3eXP92Xl2A1IOPBhE4teca2scbEuN Qo9NMZ2CMw6VwIQ2SOupD4gD+Lf4BD+sUP5d+A2TQxlf7K76SSu0eMyBQsLogicyADYf jG0a5iCZdjyajpipRUxGChUYf5MzLkmrnsEULLcsXdXZiCN9UJDuBwVZ7jUIKMjcK07K jwQg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW06LvxNd/KkeLFEVChqxbg7ENHAObtr2kkuvikVHvk4Ik4b3EpEE6OFzc3/b8nXfzHeaigALPybNpC1R7KXJc2XkRecnCTyy7g869cbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzB7Xm0dFRnlENMYZrKPFnmhasymJK3OWKA5iBhoA0siPjCUImL 8AWYJOam8jojZ6Bb63QicE5cALYjc5RW4JidF6cf3Zb9RiZMqtKs X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEe7rAnY9uQDbz0Y7OlDS91jLim4bdEpY9FTdShRZXCnoeQFpggWylXUmXRifVvfewT7s5iJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:228a:b0:1e4:c75e:aace with SMTP id b10-20020a170903228a00b001e4c75eaacemr1883931plh.29.1712723319585; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 21:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([1.146.50.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1-20020a170902ea0100b001e042dc5202sm9721472plg.80.2024.04.09.21.28.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2024 21:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:28:07 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Cancel pending HDEC exception From: "Nicholas Piggin" To: "Michael Ellerman" , "Thorsten Leemhuis" , "Vaibhav Jain" , , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240313072625.76804-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> <87sf007ax6.fsf@mail.lhotse> <87y19obfck.fsf@mail.lhotse> In-Reply-To: <87y19obfck.fsf@mail.lhotse> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mikey@neuling.org, Linux kernel regressions list , sbhat@linux.ibm.com, amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jordan Niethe , gautam@linux.ibm.com, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 3:20 PM AEST, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis writes: > > On 05.04.24 05:20, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" > >> writes: > >>> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting > >>> for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone. > >>> > >>> Was this regression ever resolved? Doesn't look like it, but maybe I > >>> just missed something. > >>=20 > >> I'm not sure how it ended up on the regression list. > > > > That is easy to explain: I let lei search for mails containing words > > like regress, bisect, and revert to become aware of regressions that > > might need tracking. And... > > > >> IMHO it's not really a regression. > > > > ...sometimes I misjudge or misinterpret something and add it to the > > regression tracking. Looks like that happened here. > > > > Sorry for that and the noise it caused! > > No worries. It is actually a regression. It only really affects performance, but the logic is broken (my fault). We were going to revert it, and solve the initial regression a better way. Thanks, Nick