From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13689679FB for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 02:34:59 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD4673062C0A97@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> References: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD4673062C0A97@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH/2.6.17-rc4 1/10] Powerpc: Add general support for mpc7 448h pc2 (Taiga) platform Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:35:11 -0500 To: Zang Roy-r61911 Cc: Yang Xin-Xin-r48390 , Paul Mackerras , Alexandre.Bounine@tundra.com, linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On May 18, 2006, at 5:21 AM, Zang Roy-r61911 wrote: > >> On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 15:12 +0800, Zang Roy-r61911 wrote: >>>> I'm not repeating Kumar's comments about that CONFIG_7xxx >>>> thing and that >>>> 7xxx/ directory, it should all go. >>>> >>> >>> Should I move my code to embedded6xx? >> >> Probably for now yes. > > I can migrate my code to embedded6xx technically. In fact, > I can move it into anywhere in the arch/powerpc/platforms. > While for mpc7448hpc2(taiga) board, it is not a embedded > application board. It is a high performance server! It seems > odd to put code there :). What's your opinion? We should rename the files so they are 7448 specific. I dont see any reason if FSL comes up with a 7449 that it wouldn't run on the same board. - k