From: "Siva Prasad" <sprasad@bivio.net>
To: <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>, <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Ramdisk Vs NFS
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:16:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D83235F0F3C86D4D889D8B9A0DA8C6D762CA81@corpexc01.corp.networkrobots.com> (raw)
Hi,
What is the primary difference between Ramdisk and NFS with respect to
the wait_queue's?
If I use ramdisk, every thing works fine, but with NFS (or you may read
as 'no ramdisk') kernel/sched.c:__wake_up_common() routines has a
problem. Basically the value of "&q->task_list->next" is out of our
memory range (not between 0xc0000000 and 0xF0000000), and this causes
trouble of accessing non-existing memory.=20
Interesting thing is, this happens much before we even load the ramdisk
drivers.
Appreciate if any one has some insight into this.
Thanks
Siva
reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D83235F0F3C86D4D889D8B9A0DA8C6D762CA81@corpexc01.corp.networkrobots.com \
--to=sprasad@bivio.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox