From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E27DDE37 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:16:26 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <989B956029373F45A0B8AF0297081890019B5BD8@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> References: <1192719847-25045-1-git-send-email-leoli@freescale.com> <1192719847-25045-2-git-send-email-leoli@freescale.com> <3551DBD0-5DCB-4ECE-8509-E99B010A6D07@kernel.crashing.org> <989B956029373F45A0B8AF0297081890019B5BD8@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] ipic: add new interrupts introduced by new chip Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:16:56 -0500 To: Li Yang-r58472 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] >> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:57 PM >> To: Li Yang-r58472 >> Cc: paulus@samba.org; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] ipic: add new interrupts >> introduced by new chip >> >> >> On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Li Yang wrote: >> >>> These interrupts are introduced by the latest Freescale SoC such as >>> MPC837x. The patch also adds comment to interrupts. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Yang >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> +---------- >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.h | 7 +- >>> include/asm-powerpc/ipic.h | 12 ++- >>> 3 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) >> >> see comments: >> >> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-October/044636.html > > But you didn't answer to my feedback > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-October/044711.html sorry missed this. > If you are so persistent on thinking it's harmful rather than useful, > please at least attempt to persuade me. The MPC5121e users the IPIC and has different interrupt assignment. I suggest that the UMs be updated to more useful not the code. - k