Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

[Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Apr 14, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>> I say leave as you have it (UCC1 == cell-index = <1>).
>>
>> Changing it so cell-index = <0> is just more confusing w/regards to
>> the docs.
>
> I don't see anything in booting-without-of.txt that requires cell- 
> index to start
> at 0, however, the only other device that starts at 1 is SATA.  Even  
> the SSI
> starts at 0:
>
>       - cell-index	  : the SSI, <0> = SSI1, <1> = SSI2, and so on
>
> Although I don't want to make more work for Anton, my vote is to  
> have cell-index
> start at 0.  That is the convention.  It's too late to fix SATA, but  
> at least we
> can avoid making it worse.

I use cell-index starting at 1 for PCI to match our docs.

I'll take Anton's last patch.

- k