From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5FBC4451C for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4h4m7s32y0z2xnK; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:28:25 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="2a01:4f8:c0c:9d57::1" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1784705305; cv=none; b=f7WUzSV+3/AtP6MrzQlEgHdpqdV2rWtPYRCCMVT594P08NnxbQRQ+2FQnGfqEvHORXvCBbatSsJDcQedCo3lRMs10KX0egfVLpZ4oQaBkpZ94dl+qlfptp9t/AgFBhq6k3z/LJQNl67HmReC1TI59DnkI1TrN+XcWwthyUpQ55MgWYZ6VnrU1KpAj2Rdh/B9xROmWkBslTE18PnSl6PAG9fRHhAFhyUYdemYN9kVj/p5AcOdz20F8Hc61fqGaO63JyTXEOxj1BtRCbuFHdcCdgaNI09mAFg+xry1slzWIz7quvPF/LEWoGafmKmAEDWnA4ox86CCnwmLY/XngzIQEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1784705305; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=c67ixvgOobnsD9YZ1g1D2/zxbHV0RHVU8Y3paFRKUfE=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=hZR6xPpesUk3so1E4C411cTBaiHvj5V7qMlhnEwfMSrVrBSj5r2hC8DIOAGppUFtfS5KQPbh52jrIC+ss0xtbm+f6pB/zMTBQNuHvUYAeRrH08IcBDk8WnvFmJddDmxZbNegsQ2882X6FqKv9S9oqqAv8HHmFjBKZDfrv84nyhqAvgMQtwB8J0YjJn1VAu3QrLKHJYyki1J/fzzlYlFxf69elb0yDFAUj1emW5peb/dhMpro/LHfg+VA8MAoVmKM5jxijm2mn9jJ43ErQWlnRPplXhRLz0R9+L65lTeFk0ZLKtOIldodAdycJmIrDNfkB/ihDXyUenTOlgln5ecb/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (client-ip=2a01:4f8:c0c:9d57::1; helo=mail.3ffe.de; envelope-from=michael@walle.cc; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=walle.cc Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=walle.cc (client-ip=2a01:4f8:c0c:9d57::1; helo=mail.3ffe.de; envelope-from=michael@walle.cc; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) X-Greylist: delayed 569 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at boromir; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:28:24 AEST Received: from mail.3ffe.de (0001.3ffe.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c0c:9d57::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4h4m7r2Rx4z2xJT for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:28:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:810b:4320:1000:4685:ff:fe12:5967]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.3ffe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60D3312F; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:18:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:18:48 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 phy-next 1/9] soc: fsl: guts: perform fsl_guts_init() error teardown in reverse order of setup Cc: , , , "Ioana Ciornei" , "Vinod Koul" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Tanjeff Moos" , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , "Shawn Guo" , "Frank Li" , From: "Michael Walle" To: "Vladimir Oltean" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20260721231603.67865-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <20260721231603.67865-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <20260721231603.67865-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Hi, On Wed Jul 22, 2026 at 1:15 AM CEST, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Michael Walle has confirmed that ignoring the error was intentional, > and we preserve that: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/DK44809N7Y8I.J2Z3U4N32H0Q@kernel.org/ I thought you wanted to check if kasprintf() fails and return an error? Just to be clear, I'm fine with either way. -michael