From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from jdl.com (www.jdl.com [66.118.10.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8AE67B1F for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:14:05 +1000 (EST) To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [RFC] Interrupt mapping documentation In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:07:00 +0200." <72C71D61-F43A-4644-BBE8-F8B3B8526195@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1150598731.23600.146.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3E324A7E-388E-4917-B380-B0831A5F9D19@kernel.crashing.org> <72C71D61-F43A-4644-BBE8-F8B3B8526195@kernel.crashing.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:14:00 -0500 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: Cc: Becky Bruce , linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , So, like, the other day Segher Boessenkool mumbled: > >> Just *require* #address-cells for everything with addressable sub- > >> nodes, > >> at least in DTC. Doesn't cost much, and no confusion anymore. > > > > Woot! Send me a patch! :-) > > Noooo... tiiiime... And way too lazy. Jinx. > Could you pick this up, please? I would not be able to get anywhere near it until significantly into August at the very earliest. Really. jdl