From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Subject: Re: Merge dtc In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:42:17 CDT." <20071017214217.GW4891@austin.ibm.com> References: <20071016050217.GA9052@localhost.localdomain> <18196.20112.728499.256646@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <5E3B6FCC-5930-4C76-AB4B-86B35551B9E0@kernel.crashing.org> <47166988.3010606@freescale.com> <20071017214217.GW4891@austin.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:51:13 -0500 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Timur Tabi , David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , So, like, the other day Linas Vepstas mumbled: > > Isn't anyone concerned about the defacto fork-of-source-code that > this causes? You betcha. That's why I'm negative on the notion, but I won't stand in front of _that_ train either. > Which will be the official version? The one I am maintaining here on jdl.com. > How will the code baes be kept in sync? I heard Gibson volunteer. :-) jdl