From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jdl@jdl.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for binary includes. 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:20:43 +1100."
	<20080105122043.GG4326@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20080104211043.GA28991@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
	<20080105122043.GG4326@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:24:32 -0600
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Message-Id: <E1JBtq4-0005DJ-7o@jdl.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> 
> 
> Hrm.  Can we leave this one until after 1.1?   Since it adds new
> syntax, I think it would be worth cogitating a bit longer.

Double hrm.

Scott, can you remind us why this feature was requested
off the U-Boot list, please?  I'm trying to decide if we
really do want to get it into the 1.1 release.

Thanks,
jdl