From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
Cc: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@freescale.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Fleming Andy-AFLEMING <afleming@freescale.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled IRQs
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:38:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1N6VZO-00077V-Hi@jdl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091105175316.GA27099@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
>
> Here is the patch on top of the Linus' git tree, if you haven't
> already 'back-ported' the previous patch.
This back-ported patch has been running in my (2.6.31) kernel
for a couple days now without showing any sign of problem.
Maybe throw a
Tested-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
at it?
jdl
> diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> index 5bf31f1..5dca99c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> @@ -1274,7 +1274,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> net_device *dev)
> u32 lstatus;
> int i;
> u32 bufaddr;
> - unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int nr_frags, length;
>
> base = priv->tx_bd_base;
> @@ -1298,14 +1297,11 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struc
> t net_device *dev)
> /* total number of fragments in the SKB */
> nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags);
> -
> /* check if there is space to queue this packet */
> if ((nr_frags+1) > priv->num_txbdfree) {
> /* no space, stop the queue */
> netif_stop_queue(dev);
> dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
> return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> }
>
> @@ -1403,9 +1399,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> net_device *dev)
> /* Tell the DMA to go go go */
> gfar_write(&priv->regs->tstat, TSTAT_CLEAR_THALT);
>
> - /* Unlock priv */
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
> -
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> @@ -1915,17 +1908,14 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int bu
> dget)
> struct net_device *dev = priv->ndev;
> int tx_cleaned = 0;
> int rx_cleaned = 0;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> /* Clear IEVENT, so interrupts aren't called again
> * because of the packets that have already arrived */
> gfar_write(&priv->regs->ievent, IEVENT_RTX_MASK);
>
> - /* If we fail to get the lock, don't bother with the TX BDs */
> - if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags)) {
> - tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
> - }
> + netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
> + tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
> + netif_tx_unlock_bh(priv->ndev);
>
> rx_cleaned = gfar_clean_rx_ring(dev, budget);
>
>
> --
> Anton Vorontsov
> email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
> irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-06 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 22:57 [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 14:01 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 14:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 14:41 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 15:43 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled IRQs Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 17:23 ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-05 17:34 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 17:40 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 17:53 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-06 20:38 ` Jon Loeliger [this message]
2009-11-05 17:53 ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-08 9:08 ` David Miller
2009-11-09 13:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-08 9:05 ` [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled David Miller
2009-11-09 13:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1N6VZO-00077V-Hi@jdl.com \
--to=jdl@jdl.com \
--cc=B05799@freescale.com \
--cc=afleming@freescale.com \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).