From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E825767A04 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:28:06 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: swizzling pci irqs Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:28:52 -0600 To: David Updegraff Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:59 PM, David Updegraff wrote: > Hi. > > If there were a noswizzle option to the kernel command line that > resulted in pci scan simply trusting that the bootrom/u-boot had > already > correctly assigned the PCI irqs.... every tom,dick,harry, and > yours-truly wouldn't have to make a new platform to define the > swizzle-o-the-day. Or have I already missed this argument? Sure, I do this now. Just don't build pci_auto into your pci support and don't explicitly rescan in your pci setup. The 83xx pci code under arch/powerpc should effective do this. - kumar