From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEFD7B6F7B for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:35:37 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:35:34 -0500 Message-Id: References: <1314905175-4371-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> To: Tabi Timur-B04825 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sep 1, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Kumar Gala = wrote: >> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other >> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be >> consistent going forward. >=20 > Shouldn't we change the nodes for all e500 based device trees in one > shot, instead of just the P4080? I changed all the e500mc class to match what is used by everyone else. = The e500v1/e500v2 are use the same convention at this time so figured a = separate patch can handle them. - k=