From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D44267C60 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:41:53 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1159899616.14294.127.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> References: <20060928160211.5b652932.kim.phillips@freescale.com> <229C6ACA-4728-408B-9360-54249996E821@kernel.crashing.org> <1159899616.14294.127.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] remove mpc83xx support from arch/ppc Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:42:08 -0500 To: Jon Loeliger Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 16:34, Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Sep 28, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: >> >>> remove 83xx support from arch/ppc. Tested multiple arch/defconfig >>> build combinations ok. AFAICT, everything 83xx works in arch/ >>> powerpc, and new derivatives are being added only to arch/powerpc, >>> so it's better not to keep this around. >> >> NACK!! we need the cuImage stuff working and in the tree before I'm >> ok with this. We have to be able to boot from a non-flat-dev >> aware u- >> boot before I'll be ok with removing 83xx from arch/ppc. >> >> - kumar > > Any idea when those patches are going to be in? Not sure, I wasn't sure if there were changes required to the patches for all the flat dev tree code going into the tree. - k