From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E9DDDF43 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:00:40 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: From: Kumar Gala To: benh@kernel.crashing.org In-Reply-To: <1223493405.8157.76.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: powerpc.git status Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:00:33 -0500 References: <1223357268.8157.38.camel@pasglop> <9B078573-0862-4176-A945-E273D78B260F@kernel.crashing.org> <1223405857.8157.55.camel@pasglop> <1351959C-EAEB-4C14-8A55-665F4C4C0601@kernel.crashing.org> <1223458152.8157.72.camel@pasglop> <9F5B82DA-D13D-4997-A247-59EAD0483230@kernel.crashing.org> <1223493405.8157.76.camel@pasglop> Cc: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 8, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 07:10 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:29 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> >>> >>>> Its useful to not rebase a branch you expect people to send you >>>> patches against and sub-maintainers are using to build tree's >>>> against. It sounds like 'next' is that branch. >>> >>> Indeed. Though so far I've managed to avoid rebasing anything :-) >> >> So what's the status of the patches moving from master into next? > > Mostly "just in case". No big deal. I'll move them over today > hopefully. Thanks. I need a stable basis to send a new pull request. - k