From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Tyner <jtyner@cs.ucr.edu>
To: Matthew Locke <mlocke@mvista.com>
Cc: andrew may <acmay@acmay.homeip.net>, Armin <akuster@pacbell.net>,
	<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] early serial init
In-Reply-To: <3CB6118E.3090406@mvista.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204111550360.2605-100000@hill.cs.ucr.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


> This does not fit the current design goals of the 4xx port

Why not? I can't possibly understand why not having to know the BASE_BAUD
ahead of time isn't a good thing.


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/