linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, "Jenkins, Clive" <Clive.Jenkins@xerox.com>
Subject: Re: Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian?
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:54:09 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0602011851490.22854-100000@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wtgeeq8o.fsf@48ers.dk>

On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

> >>>>> "Matt" == Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> 
>  Matt> read*/write* and ioread*/iowrite* generate outbound little
>  Matt> endian cycles on ALL arches, period.  They are intended
>  Matt> only for PCI use and have generic names only because of
>  Matt> the assumption that "all the world is a PC".
> 
> What is the preferred way of accessing non-PCI devices then? Direct
> pointer access?

No direct pointer access is bad. On PPC You can use
in_be{8,16,32}/out_be{8,16,32}

- kumar

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-02  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-01 11:19 Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian? Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 17:02 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 17:44   ` Matt Porter
2006-02-01 17:53     ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:04     ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:11       ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 18:20         ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:23           ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 21:14     ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02  0:54       ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2006-02-02  3:07         ` Matt Porter
2006-02-02  8:09         ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02  9:08           ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 17:34             ` Dale Farnsworth
2006-02-02 14:21           ` Matt Porter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-01 18:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 20:35 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-02  9:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-02  9:46 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 14:37   ` Matt Porter
2006-02-02 17:45     ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 18:16       ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0602011851490.22854-100000@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=Clive.Jenkins@xerox.com \
    --cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).