linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Embedded Linux PPC list <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash?
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:13:18 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0406280600140.3259@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040628070916.706A6C109F@atlas.denx.de>


(sorry, i realize that this isn't directly related to PPC issues.)

as a first followup question, now that i've just created a 4M
partition on an 8M flash chip, and formatted it as JFFS2, if i put a
copy of the root FS on that filesystem, i can of course boot and use
that as my root filesystem.  but, at the moment, since i'm booting
with what is essentially a zImage.initrd, the kernel is first loaded,
and then the uncompressed root filesystem is copied into RAM of
course.

i suspect that leaving my root filesystem in flash would cause
noticeable performance problems (even if i managed to structure it so
that it could be read-only).  how hard would it be to automatically
have that root FS copied from JFFS2 to RAM and mounted from there?
can that be done as a kernel option i haven't seen?  or do i have to
do that manually, involving something like "pivot_root"?  or is it
worth the trouble?

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> In message <Pine.LNX.4.60.0406271836300.10210@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>>
>>    with this configuration, it's obviously not possible to update files
>> or directories in the bootable image individually -- it's just one big
>> zImage.initrd image.
>
> What makes you think that this is not  possible?  If  there  is  (for
> example)  a  writable JFFS2 partition available, you can use this for
> an overlay filesystem to store the updates.
>
> See for example the "mini_fo" overlay filesystem on  our  FTP  server
> and the paper about it:
> http://www.denx.de/PDF/Diplomarbeit-MK-1.0-net.pdf

ah, now this looks interesting.  from a quick glance, is this just a
theoretical concept, or has it been implemented?  we have *some* JFFS2
space available, but not a guaranteed amount.  if this requires a
completely separate JFFS2 partition, we might not be able to handle
that.

>>    but is it feasible to redefine the layout of that flash chip and
>> take, say, 4M of it and create a JFFS2 filesystem, then put the root
>> filesystem in there uncompressed?  (assuming, of course, that the
>
> Standard JFFS2 code will always compress.

sorry, i'm not sure what you're saying here.  are you saying that i
can create a compressed JFFS2 image of my root filesystem on my build
host, just as i do when i create my zImage.initrd?  or just compress
the individual files in the filesystem?  and have this filesystem
automatically loaded into, and mounted from, RAM?  can you clarify
this?

> This is a pretty standard setup. Although I don't really recommend to
> use JFFS2 for root filesystem (for example, because with a  big  root
> filesystem  the boot time may deteriorate).

that was one of my concerns -- not just the boot time but the run
time, even if i could structure it as read-only.

> Instead, we usually split the stuff in a read-only partition (for
> example cramfs), a volatile part (tmpfs), and a persistent storage
> partition (JFFS2).

that's awfully close to what we're doing now.  we've got the tmpfs, we
have a completely separate flash for persistent apps and data, it's
just the root filesystem that i would *dearly* love to be able to
patch on the fly on a running system.  i'll look a lot more closely
into the above.  thanks.

rday

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-28 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-27 22:46 loading the kernel and root FS separately from flash? Robert P. J. Day
2004-06-28  3:58 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-06-28 10:00   ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-06-28  7:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28  9:42   ` David Woodhouse
2004-06-28 10:19     ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-06-28 10:48       ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 10:52         ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-06-28 10:23     ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-06-28 10:36     ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 10:40       ` David Woodhouse
2004-06-28 10:13   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2004-06-28 10:41     ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 10:50       ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-06-29  9:31         ` David Woodhouse
2004-06-29 12:09           ` Robert P. J. Day
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-28 11:33 Gerhard TAEUBL
     [not found] <s0e01d9a.092@mail.frequentis.com>
2004-06-28 12:11 ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.60.0406280600140.3259@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=wd@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).