From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts36.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.93]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74CC2BDA1 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 06:07:32 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:00:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" To: Tom Rini In-Reply-To: <20041005192950.GL32692@smtp.west.cox.net> Message-ID: References: <20041005192950.GL32692@smtp.west.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list Subject: Re: [PATCH] first in a series to enhance microcode patches List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:20:37PM -0400, Dan Malek wrote: >> No, send a whole patch that _does_ something. Let's see all of these >> changes at once. By itself, this patch is useless and doesn't add any >> features, it just wastes our time discussing it. > > A series of inter-dependant patches might be better, but I like small, > easy to understand patches. you know, it's a good thing i'm severely bipolar. :-) somebody needs to make a decision -- i'll go with whatever it is. rday